Anti-AFSPA protestors demand "Free Burma and Aung San Suu Kyi"
September 15, 2007: (Citizen News Service) The ongoing solidarity fast in support of Irom Chanu Sharmila's struggle to repeal Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSPA) has broadened its agenda congruent with the declarations of past New Delhi (2005) and Lahore (2006) Peaceful South Asia Conventions – demand for a Free Burma and Free Aung San Suu Kyi.
Irom Chanu Sharmila – the iron lady of Manipur in India , has been on a continuous fast since 2000 demanding repeal of AFSPA.
Despite the restrictions of house
arrest, Aung San Suu Kyi continued to campaign for democracy, similar to Irom
Sharmila, who has been under confinement and steadfastly protesting against
AFSPA since past 7 years now.
Filmmaker Mahesh Bhatt has endorsed this fast along with hundreds of other
organizations and individuals globally.
Countless people are fasting for five days (13-17 September) in Keishampat
junction, Imphal, Manipur, to lobby more support to the anti-AFSPA campaign.
Significant others from different countries in the world have signed up on
www.ashaparivar.org to fast for varying durations from September 13 to support
the campaign.
The launch of this five days solidarity fast came two days after the 'Apunba
Lup' observed Anti-army Act Day on September 11 here to mark the completion of
five decades of the act in the North-East. The present UPA Government had
constituted the Justice Jeevan Reddy Commission in 2004 to review AFSPA in
response to an intensive campaign led by 'Apunba Lup'.
By 1988, Burma
was burgeoning with pro-democracy movement, fueled by the energy and idealism
among the country's young people. There were demonstrations against the
repressive, one-party socialist government. Aung San Suu Kyi was drawn into the
pro-democracy movement, which was snuffed out by State Law and Order
Restoration Council (SLORC), which seized power on September 18, 1988.
Thousands of pro-democracy advocates were killed.
Next came a general election in 1990, which political parties were allowed to
contest. Aung San Suu Kyi, who was leading the National League for Democracy
(NLD), won a landslide victory, with 80 per cent support. SLORC leaders refused
to accept the election results putting the elected pro-democracy leaders under
house arrest, including Aung San Suu Kyi.
Despite the restrictions of house arrest, Aung San Suu Kyi continues to
campaign for democracy. She was awarded the Nobel Prize for peace in 1991.
The protests of Sharmila and Aung San Suu Kyi represent the most ideal form of
peaceful struggles for a democratic demand.
Their victory is essential for the strengthening of democracy in South Asia and for the respect for human rights around
the world.
Their victory will determine whether the voice of common citizen will be heard
or the state will continue to trample over people's rights with anti-people
laws and policies.